Tag: Val Fraser

  • Faith: How the former wife of Stephen Hawking emerged from the shadows of her past.

    Faith: How the former wife of Stephen Hawking emerged from the shadows of her past.

    Dr Jane Helyer Jones is an accomplished writer and novelist, she is also Jane Hawking, the former wife of Stephen Hawking. She’s the author of the best selling book Travelling to Infinity, which is the true story behind the famous motion picture film The Theory of Everything.

    The film tells the story of Jane’s early life with her husband, Professor Stephen Hawking, who is possibly the world’s best known scientist and the world’s best known sufferer of motor neurone disease. Stephen is played by Eddie Redmayne and Jane is played by Felicity Jones. Jane told the BBC, “Felicity’s performance was phenomenal. When I saw her on the screen I was flabbergasted because she captured my mannerisms, my movements, my patterns of speech even.” It is a stunning performance and Felicity Jones somehow portrays the complex bitter sweet nature of Jane’s life.

    Just as in real life it’s a beautiful love story and Jane is clearly devoted to Stephen. But as Stephen’s disability worsens she becomes his carer. His fame and career place more and more demands upon her and she struggles with the physical and emotional effort of this work alongside the job of caring for their young family.

    Jane told Christian Connection, “Faith was my rock and my blessing because I believed that there was help and support for me in all the challenges I faced and that things would resolve themselves eventually.”

    In another interview she said: “I felt I needed the rock of my faith to do what might be expected of me, I was very dependent on my faith to help me through. I thought there must be a loving God acting in his (Stephen’s) life otherwise he might not have been gifted with the brain of a genius which enabled him to do the science that he could do. He couldn’t walk, he was having difficulty talking, he couldn’t write. All he could do was think, but he could think in such an extraordinary way, in a way not given to many people, to himself and [Albert] Einstein perhaps, but not many others. And that seemed to me to be the most extraordinary gift.”

    In 2018 Jane told Readers Digest: “One day I asked him (Stephen) ‘How do you decide on a theory?’. He said, ‘Well you have to look at all the possibilities in various areas of research and decide what you’re interested in. Then you decide which area of research is most likely to give you the positive result. So you choose your theory, your area of interest, and then you have to take a leap of faith.’ I said, ‘What? What’s the difference between taking a leap of faith in physics and other people taking a leap of faith in religion?’ He laughed.”

    Jane describes her parents as ‘darlings’ and says her Christian faith has helped her persevere, “I think my parents were rather taken aback, but they were very supportive of me when I married Stephen, and my mum, Beryl, encouraged me to keep faith as the way forward”.

    Her first novel Silent Music was published by Alma Books in 2016. It tells the story of a child growing up in an unhappy family in London after the Second World War. The title of the series is The Immortal Souls. This stems from Jane’s belief that “everybody has a spark of spirituality and the divine inside them, and that circumstances often combine to prevent that spark from blossoming”.

    “I saw Stephen’s spark blossom and my own is blossoming now in so many ways. I have my wonderful children and I’m doing all the things I want to do, especially my writing. I’ve been down a long winding path to reach that ultimate fulfilment but I think I’ve found it now.”

    Jane is a strong, inspirational woman who has emerged from the shadows of her past and found a new life for herself. She’s found meaningful creative work. She’s found a special love with her husband Jonathon Jones Helyer, together they share a strong faith and a deep love of music. Her life has a happy ending. She said: “Life goes on doesn’t it? One year succeeds another and you concentrate on all the really wonderful things.”

    Interview credits: Readers Digest, The National, Christian Connection, BBC Woman’s Hour.

  • Review: A Beautiful Day in the Neighbourhood with Tom Hanks

    Review: A Beautiful Day in the Neighbourhood with Tom Hanks

    When I lived in the USA, Fred Rogers had his own children’s’ show on American television. In the popular programme Rogers sort of played himself – he is Mr Rogers. The show usually opened with him arriving ‘home’ and singing his trademark opening song “A beautiful day in the neighbourhood” before speaking directly to camera and asking “won’t you be my neighbour?”.

    I confess to enjoying this background hum of gentle activity on day time television. The pace was slow, the themes authentic. Though the years have passed, as I began watching Tom Hanks portray Rogers, I admit to harbouring my own pre-conceived ideas about the storyline. Nearly all of them were wrong.

    I was delighted to discover that this film is as much about Fred Rogers as it is about the journalist, Lloyd Vogel, (played by Matthew Rhys) who interviews Rogers at length over the course of several months. I relish films which reveal the internal struggles of writers. Especially ‘tortured’ writers, of which Vogel is definitely one. His character is based on real life journalist, Tom Junod, who wrote the 1998 article “Can you say … Hero?” published in Esquire.

    During one interview there was an intense, pivotal moment when Vogel, an angry troubled soul, challenges Rogers about the success of his role as a father. Clearly wounded and outraged by this probing, deeply personal question, Rogers squares up to this intentional nastiness with a glaring, lip pursing silence, before delivering a thoughtful gracious response. In this particular scene, I found veteran actor Hanks, mesmerising in his depiction of a man choosing to process and control his raw anger before speaking out or taking action which might hurt another person.

    Whether or not you’re familiar with the work of Fred Rogers, A Beautiful Day in the Neighbourhood, delivers a heart-warming story in which kindness overcomes cruelty.

  • News: Survivors of modern slavery safe, supported and seen

    News: Survivors of modern slavery safe, supported and seen

    What bird do you associate with this time of year? For most people, the answer is the robin. But for the team at Hope for Justice, at Christmas especially, they think of the bird in their logo, the swallow. Tim Nelson, Chief Executive at Hope for Justice explained: “Over winter, swallows travel an incredible 6,000 miles from the UK to South Africa and Namibia. It takes them six weeks, and as well as coping with extreme weather conditions, they run the risk of starvation and exhaustion. But, despite their long migration, swallows nearly always come back to the same colony, and almost half have been found to return to the exact same nest.”

    This process has close parallels to the work at Hope for Justice. As well as rescuing people out of exploitative situations, they work to safely reunite survivors of modern slavery with their families. Many of the survivors they work with have been trafficked across continents. Even more feel worlds away from the person they once were and the life they once had.

    Tim said: “No matter where someone is on their journey, we walk alongside them so they feel safe, supported, seen. And our greatest joy of all comes when we step back, and watch them fly. This Christmas, you can help a survivor feel like themselves again. You can help a survivor return home. And you can be the reason they can soar to their full potential.”

    Thanks to a generous match-donor, whatever you can give to Hope for Justice this year will be doubled, meaning you can have twice the impact. Please donate here.

    Main photo credit: Julian at Unsplash

  • News: Churches campaign for women’s safety

    News: Churches campaign for women’s safety

    Christian campaigners are highlighting the realities of violence against women during the 16 Days of Activism Against Gender-Based Violence. Red chairs are being placed in churches, businesses, train stations and schools to raise awareness that, globally, a woman or girl dies at the hands of an intimate partner or family member every 11 minutes.

    The 16 Days of Activism Against Gender-Based Violence is an annual campaign that begins on 25 November, the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women, and runs through to International Human Rights Day on 10 December.

    The Red Chair Project began in French churches, but now through the Christian Network to End Domestic Abuse, is being replicated throughout the world by Christian organisations who want to galvanise the church to speak up and do something about violence against women and girls.

    The Red Chair Project involves reserving an empty chair in a public place with a sign in red highlighting facts about domestic violence. The empty chair also serves as a visual symbol of the lives lost to gender-based violence. The colour red reminds us all of the violence faced by millions of women in war zones, on city streets, and also in their own homes. The sign is available in French, English, Spanish, Hindi, Romanian, Hungarian, and more.

    Bekah Legg, CEO of Christian charity Restored says; “At Restored, we speak up about violence against women 365 days a year, but this is a great opportunity for everyone to do something simple. Violence against women is such a pervasive problem, that most people don’t know where to start, but this project makes it easy to make a difference and start to change a culture which normalises violence against women.

    Restored will be sharing pictures of Red Chairs around the country on their social media over the 16 Days of Activism. If you would like to get involved and set up your own Red Chair in your community, find out more and download the resources at www.restored-uk.org/redchair.

  • News: UK charities fight slavery and injustice

    News: UK charities fight slavery and injustice

    The World Cup in Qatar is marred with controversy: reports of migrant workers exploited, injured or killed, working in terrible conditions to build stadiums, hotels and infrastructure for the tournament. Sadly, these issues aren’t limited to this football tournament: exploitation and slavery is happening everywhere; it’s rife in the supply chains of the smartphone we check the latest score on, and in the clothing we wear.

    An estimated 28 million people are in forced labour slavery globally, three million more than five years ago. Three charities, Compassion, IJM, and Tearfund have joined forces to take a stand against the injustices that force people into slavery around the world. They had this message for Sorted readers: “With your support we will help families through the global food crisis and empower communities to lift themselves out of poverty so that they are less vulnerable to traffickers; and we will bring victims of slavery and violence around the world to safety and see perpetrators brought to justice so that they can’t harm others. We believe in a God who calls us to seek justice, and that when churches and charities unite, miraculous change becomes possible.”

    Desmond Tutu famously said: “There comes a point where we need to stop just pulling people out of the river. We need to go upstream and find out why they’re falling in.”

    Find out how you can get involved at: Justice United

  • Comment: By any other name

    Comment: By any other name

    My name is not Sylvia. And yet a former superior insisted on calling me Sylvia, while knowing full well that my name was not, in actual fact, Sylvia. He appeared to be friendly enough but his smile was more of a smirk, like that of a little boy who was getting away with something naughty. I staged a mild protest. But he grinned all the more while delivering this inaccurate salutation, seeming pleased to have drawn a rise out of me. Soon others, those ranked beneath him, began addressing me as Sylvia too. They seemed confused. I protested further. But the mis-naming continued and, if I wanted to hang on to my bottom-of-the-pile job, there didn’t seem to be a right lot I could do about it.

    My name is not Maureen. In a different work place, a person I was answerable to insisted on calling me Maureen, while knowing full well that my name was not, in actual fact, Maureen. He was joking around and laughing at his own ‘brilliant’ sense of humour. At first I laughed too, but after a while I couldn’t keep up the pretence. It felt too much like an adult version of the bored school boy who pulled my pig tails and I started to wonder what the actual heck was wrong with these people.

    Names matter. Especially people’s names. There’s a kind of passive aggressive power play going on when we decide to use a name that someone doesn’t like or want. I’ve seen this sort of jokey, mild bullying tactic happen to others, and I’ve been on the receiving end of it too. It’s galling. But isn’t it lovely when someone, usually a professional, takes the trouble to ask what name you prefer to be addressed by? It’s a gesture of kindness, courtesy and respect. Claiming your preferred name is liberating. Re-naming yourself is an important autonomous act. Children sometimes do this when they reach their teenage years; we ignore their decision at our peril. For many, taking on the surname of another at the point of marriage also represents a major shift in identity.

    Positive name giving, and re-naming, are viewed by some (mostly me) as a divine act. By this I mean that it’s not something to be done lightly. Back in my Sunday school days I noticed that in stories about the Almighty He was big on giving names to people and places. Re-naming seemed high on His agenda too. It’s akin to the gift of a fresh start, a new identity, a new role, a promotion, new purpose or fresh function.

    It’s in this spirit of renewal that I’ve become a self-appointed nano name giver. I’m currently writing a book about some long forgotten places, parts of them have no formal name at all. I can see no reason why I can’t make up an appropriate new name for a tiny part of a place, especially when that part is nameless. Naming something gives it credence. A made up name can stick because just one person started using it, and if you really think about it every name for every place had to be made up by someone. So why not me? I’m hopeful it will catch on.

    As a journalist the names of people, and especially places, hold a fascination for me. At some point in time every person and every place was nameless. Somewhere along the way, by accident or design, a name was chosen by one person. Someone was the very first person to utter the words Borsdane Woods or Rivington Pike or Blackpool or Leeds or Fred’s Field. And it caught on, just like with the Sylvia thing.